The familiar relation of cause and effect has thus vanished, along with all its metaphysical perplexities: every part of the set ofĬoncurrent events is now the determining cause of all the remainder. It involves that knowledge of change in any small part of a system determines the change throughout: that each part is in a sense the cause of the whole. Such complete interdetermination is a very remarkable mode of relation. For nontechnical audiences, the best description of his meaning I could find in the paper was this: Sir Joseph Larmor, for example, an Irish physicist and mathematician, used the term in a theoretical physics treatise titled "Questions in Physical Interdetermination" (1920, in the Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians). The definition varies with the specialized field of application. (Definition from Merriam Webster Unabridged.)Ī thorough and agreed upon definition of 'interdetermination' is not easy to come by. N.: The fact or condition of depending each upon the other mutual dependence.Īnother possibility, although much less common and perhaps suited only to technical uses (for example, in systems theory), is 'interdetermination':Ĭause and effect operating among several factors : multiple causation. or interdependence, n.Īdj.: Dependent each upon the other mutually dependent. First, and perhaps best by reason of its frequency and conformance with the meaning you described, is 'interdependent' or 'interdependence': You're using the idea itself to try to explain the idea, essentially going in circles.ĭo any of these things sound familiar to you?įor the single word, two might satisfy your description. An example is, "All apples are red therefore all apples are red." In this example, stating that "all apples are red" in the attempt to justify the statement that, "All apples are red," is silly because it doesn't offer any additional explanation. It describes a bad way of thinking which ends at the same place it began. ![]() If the ocean makes the sky blue precisely in reaction or response to the sky making the ocean blue, you could say the ocean is "reciprocating". "Reciprocity" is a noun meaning when one thing does something for another thing, that thing responds in kind. "Mutual causality" could mean one thing causes the other and vice versa, for example. "Mutual" can be an adverb or an adjective describing two things having something in common. You would need to use more than one word, and there is no good phrase that fits every context you might want to use that idea in.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |